Quick Answers
Computed from approved student reviews on Careviews
What rating does Bhanwar Borana have on Careviews?
Bhanwar Borana is rated 4.3/5 by 4 CA students on Careviews for DT.
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Aarish Khan
(0)Bhanwar Borana
(4)Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt, Concept Building, Working Professionals
Pros
Best teacher available in the market fir DT with year's of experience in this field and provides conceptual clarity of chapters
Cons
Not recommended for exam oriented students as it covers a larger part.
Great for students who want conceptual clarity, but the notes are quite content-heavy.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
On Study Leave
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Pros
DT concepts are taught in a very simplified manner. Strong command over provisions, amendments, and practical application. Excellent exam-oriented teaching approach. Complex tax topics become easy to understand. Revision techniques and charts are highly effective. Focus on problem-solving and ICAI questions is excellent. Classes are interactive and engaging. Notes are concise, structured, and easy to revise. Helps in building strong conceptual as well as practical understanding. Great guidance for scoring well in DT.
Cons
None
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Exam-Focused Students, Last-Minute Revisers
Pros
The material is comprehensive and covers almost everything required for exam revision. Practical examples are given when explaining technical sections / concepts.
Cons
The question bank falls short when compared to other faculties' materials. The class sometimes gets boring and feels rushed in certain topics.
Good faculty with comprehensive conceptual material.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants, First Timers, Repeaters
Pros
Really liked the notes and the overall coverage including the QB.
Cons
Unlike other teacher, there wasn’t any connection, he doesn’t interact with students as much as other new gen teachers.
Totally go for his regular batch, he’ll solve most of the questions and the conceptual clarity helped me in exam and outside too. I also referred his YouTube revision videos.
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.