Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Across 6 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Adish Jain higher on 9 of 10 rating dimensions.
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Adish Jain
(1)Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
On Study Leave
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners
Pros
The question bank of Adish jain sir is actually really good, even if you dont remember anything from clases, sir has given "self notes" in the question bank to recollect you the tricky points in the particular questions. question coverage is also very good.
Cons
No con as such
Ajay Agarwal
(5)Course
Regular
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Exam-Focused Students, Rank Aspirants, Working Professionals / Articleship, First Timers, Repeaters
Pros
Notes and QB are too the point! Teaching method is best for exam oriented as we all are aware the difficulty level of AFM exams these days. If you have taken classes from someone else and unable to understand AFM, go with Ajay sir
Cons
Doubt handling can be kind of rude at times
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Industrial Training
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Last-Minute Revisers, Exam-Focused Students
Pros
Again, misses minor concepts, other than that very good notes, explaining each step. Also solving almost all questions in class.
Cons
Used to talk 20% about politics, criticizing other people believes and trash talking about other faculties.
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
On Study Leave
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Exam-Focused Students, Rank Aspirants
Pros
Concept clarity is excellent and practical. Teaching style is concise and exam-oriented. Strong grip on numericals and valuation concepts. Covers ICAI questions thoroughly. Great for building AFM fundamentals. Revision strategy and shortcuts are very helpful. Classes are engaging and easy to understand. Good balance of theory and practical application. Regular practice questions improve confidence. Helpful for both first-time learners and revision.
Cons
None
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Working Professional
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: First Attempt, Multiple Attempts, Fast Revision
Pros
This is perfect for someone who is exam oriented and can trade-off some concept clarity for speed and exam oriented content coverage.
Cons
Doubt support could be better, and the fact that all sums are solved in class and no homework is given might be a con to some.
Great for first attempters and even repeat attempters just due to the fact that how on point and exam oriented the classes are, the only USP imo.
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Rank Aspirants, Last-Minute Revisers, Working Professionals / Articleship, Exam-Focused Students
Pros
Teaching, notes and revision videos are good
Cons
Should use voice changer and not wander off into random discussions. Sometimes over explains the most basic concepts.
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.