Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Across 4 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Adish Jain higher on 4 of 10 rating dimensions (5 tied).
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Adish Jain
(1)Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
On Study Leave
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners
Pros
The question bank of Adish jain sir is actually really good, even if you dont remember anything from clases, sir has given "self notes" in the question bank to recollect you the tricky points in the particular questions. question coverage is also very good.
Cons
No con as such
Bhavik Chokshi
(3)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt, Concept Building, Working Professionals, Rankers
Pros
No time pass teaching - if this is something that you love then he is the guy for you alongwith excellent concept clarity plus the notes are just too good to ignore
Cons
The hours were high and sometimes it felt like it was being dragged
It is absolutely good for everyone who prefers just teaching and absolutely no other stuff in between. Concept clarity is provided by almost every faculty out there, no time pass and getting in depth is what stood out for me. If you can bear a person speaking AFM for 220 hours, he is the guy to go with!
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants, Last-Minute Revisers, Repeaters, First Timers, Working Professionals / Articleship
Pros
Excellent for in-depth syllabus coverage and he is teaching coceptually so you can tackle some questions like May 26
Cons
notes for practical part can be improved lookwise, concept wise it's good
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Rank Aspirants, Conceptual Learners, First Timers, Repeaters
Pros
Conceptual teaching across all the topics, especially the tricky ones. I've understood the logic of the formulae and the workings only after watching his lectures.
Cons
The hours might feel long in some topics, but the teaching stays relevant and interesting nevertheless.
Great faculty to learn from to have great conceptual clarity and continued interest in the subject. I've scored exemptions in all three papers he teaches (FR, SFM & GFRS(6E)).
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.