AFM · FINAL
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Concept Clarity
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Exam Focus & Efficiency
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Study Material & Notes
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
ICAI Questions Coverage
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Syllabus Coverage
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Doubt Resolution
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Revision Quality
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Pace of Teaching
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Value for Money
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Expectation Match
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. CareViews does not endorse any faculty.
Ajay Agarwal
(2)Course
Regular
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Exam-Focused Students, Rank Aspirants, Working Professionals / Articleship, First Timers, Repeaters
Pros
Notes and QB are too the point! Teaching method is best for exam oriented as we all are aware the difficulty level of AFM exams these days. If you have taken classes from someone else and unable to understand AFM, go with Ajay sir
Cons
Doubt handling can be kind of rude at times
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Working Professional
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: First Attempt, Multiple Attempts, Fast Revision
Pros
This is perfect for someone who is exam oriented and can trade-off some concept clarity for speed and exam oriented content coverage.
Cons
Doubt support could be better, and the fact that all sums are solved in class and no homework is given might be a con to some.
Great for first attempters and even repeat attempters just due to the fact that how on point and exam oriented the classes are, the only USP imo.
Pavan Karmele
(2)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt
Pros
Good for conceptual clarity
Cons
Doesn't provide concept book
Requires making your own notes while studying, so not recommended for students starting studies after articleship
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt, Multiple Attempts, Concept Building
Pros
Conceptually, he's top-notch. He doesn't waste time teaching every possible trick or shortcut that's irrelevant for the exam like some other faculties do. just pure concepts. makes even the toughest topics feel easy af
Cons
He never replied to any of my doubts, and this is the only area where he needs to improve. Actually, not just mine, he barely replies to anyone's doubts
Good to go if you're okay with not getting doubt support from the faculty