Auditing · Inter
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Ankit Mundra CAWallah
(0)Shubham Keshwani
(3)Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Self Study
Attempt
Third Attempt+
Teaching Style
Revision Focused
Best for: Fast Revision
Pros
Covering concepts in short period of time
Cons
Much of his shortcuts are not retained , so didn't actually came in handy
His lectures gives positive vibes but are not actually understandable and retainable.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Exam-Focused Students, Rank Aspirants, Last-Minute Revisers
Pros
Great notes, although coverage could be a bit more exhaustive. Conceptual clarity is good, would help you gain an exemption if you study from him given you follow his tricks and revise multiple times.
Cons
Material could be a bit more exhaustive, not from an exam perspective, but from a conceptual one.
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Exam-Focused Students
Pros
Does get the job done. His book is the main pro to his teaching style
Cons
Extremely poor in explaining concepts , by relating them to the field of study. He constantly brought up food and irrelevant annoying tv shows.
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.