Quick Answers
Computed from approved student reviews on Careviews
Who do students rate higher for Accounts, Anubhav Prakash Jain or Bhavik Chokshi?
Across 3 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Bhavik Chokshi higher on 4 of 10 rating dimensions (4 tied).
What rating does Anubhav Prakash Jain have on Careviews?
Anubhav Prakash Jain is rated 4.6/5 by 1 CA student on Careviews for Accounts.
What rating does Bhavik Chokshi have on Careviews?
Bhavik Chokshi is rated 4.8/5 by 2 CA students on Careviews for Accounts.
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Across 3 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Bhavik Chokshi higher on 4 of 10 rating dimensions (4 tied).
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Anubhav Prakash Jain
(1)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: First Attempt
Pros
This faculty is highly recommended for F2F if you're as interactive as the faculty is. Highly experienced and well versed with the ICAI pattern. Narrates concepts for 15 percent time, Explains notes for 20-25 percent time and solves questions for the balance time (of the class). There's a good coverage of every important topic. Plans every single question which is to be done at different phases of preparation : Class, 1st rev, 2nd rev and 3rd rev. His 50 hour revision series is publicly available for free, and updated for every attempt. Forms a deep bond with the students.
Cons
He would mostly deliver concepts right at the beginning with use of hypothetical scenarios and certain real-life examples, but that would require a lot of concentration as he would simply narrate it to the class. Strong listening skills is recommended for the students to quickly grasp the concepts. Most students get "zoned out" during his narrations. This approach worked 10-15 years back. Though most students also end up understanding the gist of it after seeing the notes.
Appropriate coverage of the relevant topics. Versatile for most topics though the most benefit lies when student has strong listening and imagination for deep Understanding of concepts. Question solving is great and with proper explanations. Questions are relevant.
Bhavik Chokshi
(2)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants
Pros
Took Bhavik sir's classes for Inter, conceptual clarity was amazing, questions coverage was also good, goes into depth to actually explain to you what the standard actually means.
Cons
Question Bank was good, but i think the concept notes could have been better drafted.
Teaches majority in english, so see if you are comfortable with that!
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Conceptual Learners, First Timers
Pros
No non-sense approach teaching style. Great conceptual clarity. He made us write explanations for difficult/tricky adjustments which was very helpful during revision.
Cons
During revision period , i felt that his concept book was too concise and made it difficult to revise only from concept book.
Overall he is a amazing faculty for accounts. You may have to refer his revision videos or write some pointers if you prefer to revise from concept book.
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.