Costing · Inter
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
CA Cryril Varghese
(0)Namit Arora
(2)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt, Multiple Attempts, Concept Building, Fast Revision, Last Day Revision
Pros
He makes topic too easy. Explains the topic and logic behind it. His question bank is very vast covering questions from 2000s' MTPS, RTPS and PYQS, which is good for practice. And his booster batch(revision videos) is too good. That helped me to revise it quickly and still covering syllabus properly.
Cons
There is no such cons for me but i felt during classes that he explains every point multiple times(3-4 or maybe more times) which increases the durations of lectures. This affects the overall pacing of the batch.
Overall my experience was amazing and i highly recommend Namit sir. If you think , you are short on time or don't want to give 200+ hours for costing , you can opt for Fast Track. You can also refer to his revision videos and notes that he provide for revision videos , these helps too much during revision period.
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Pros
I had a great learning experience with this faculty. The concepts were explained clearly with a strong focus on understanding, and the teaching style made even difficult topics easy to grasp. Overall, I would highly recommend this faculty to anyone looking for quality guidance.
Cons
No major drawbacks in my experience.
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.