Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Across 4 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Pragnesh Kanabar higher on 8 of 10 rating dimensions (2 tied).
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Kapil Goyal
(1)Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Pros
Nothing
Cons
Concepts are not explained with enough clarity. Lectures are unnecessarily lengthy with too much off-topic discussion.
One of the biggest disappointments I've had. The demo lectures are excellent and make you believe the entire course will be taught at that standard, but once you enroll, the quality drops significantly. It honestly feels like two completely different teachers. The explanations become confusing, lectures are unnecessarily long, and a lot of time is spent on things that don't add value to learning. Instead of making Audit easier, the classes made it feel more complicated and frustrating. I enrolled expecting conceptual clarity, but I ended up relying on other resources to understand several topics. If the same effort had gone into the actual classes as the demo lectures, this could have been a great course. I wouldn't recommend buying this course based solely on the demo. Watch multiple full lectures first before making a decision.
Pragnesh Kanabar
(3)Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt, Multiple Attempts, Working Professionals, Concept Building
Pros
Even in the fasttrack batch, he explains everything (SAs, SQC1 and PE) so clearly nd crisply that audit feels more like a conceptual subject than a cramming one
Cons
If you want to study SAs and PE in detail, then go for him. In the fasttrack batch, the rest of the topics are mostly skimmed through. doubt support also needs improvement. I'd suggest attending his classes just for SAs and PE to build your understanding, then switching to the Icai module or another faculty's notes for the rest
One should buy his classes only after considering the pros and cons mentioned in the reviews
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Concept Building
Pros
Excellent conceptual clarity, teaching style is good, he links stuff practically and he is also quite funny ngl
Cons
His question bank is garbage. That’s it
V good experience from conceptual perspective. Don’t refer his QB and ur good to go
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Industrial Training
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Repeaters, Exam-Focused Students
Pros
Good teaching methodology with real-life examples. Comprehensive coverage of the syllabus.
Cons
I ordered fasttrack lectures the material provided by them have like fill in the blanks types coloums which they will filled up in lectures so i think they should give a proper concept book.
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.