Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Across 5 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Shubham Keshwani higher on 10 of 10 rating dimensions.
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Kapil Goyal
(1)Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Pros
Nothing
Cons
Concepts are not explained with enough clarity. Lectures are unnecessarily lengthy with too much off-topic discussion.
One of the biggest disappointments I've had. The demo lectures are excellent and make you believe the entire course will be taught at that standard, but once you enroll, the quality drops significantly. It honestly feels like two completely different teachers. The explanations become confusing, lectures are unnecessarily long, and a lot of time is spent on things that don't add value to learning. Instead of making Audit easier, the classes made it feel more complicated and frustrating. I enrolled expecting conceptual clarity, but I ended up relying on other resources to understand several topics. If the same effort had gone into the actual classes as the demo lectures, this could have been a great course. I wouldn't recommend buying this course based solely on the demo. Watch multiple full lectures first before making a decision.
Shubham Keshwani
(4)Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: First Attempt, Last Day Revision, Fast Revision
Pros
Concise notes with pointers available
Cons
Marked almost every point as important.
Revision lecture ate very helpful even for those who had not seen lectures.
Course
Regular
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants
Pros
Revision videos are good, individual chapters are good
Cons
Standards of auditing teaching is not good, taking too much hours and book is too long.
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
On Study Leave
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Pros
Audit concepts are explained in a very practical way. Strong focus on standards and professional ethics. Teaching style is simple, clear, and easy to retain. Excellent exam-oriented approach with proper revision. Helps in understanding audit language and presentation. Real-life examples make concepts more relatable. Coverage of ICAI questions and amendments is comprehensive. Regular tests and discussions improve confidence. Notes are concise and highly useful for revision. Great guidance for both conceptual clarity and scoring well.
Cons
None
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
Third Attempt+
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants, First Timers, Repeaters
Pros
The thing that stood out the most was, he was very interactive and always replied to doubts personally ( voice notes ).
Cons
The notes used many short forms and memory tricks, it can get overwhelming at times.
The teaching style and revision videos are very good but the notes were very “to the point” and in exams I found it difficult to form a good structure around the main points and words. Other than that he’s good.
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.