Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Nitin Guru
(0)Praveen Kathod
(2)Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Pros
As someone with very little finance/ stocks knowledge, I found his teaching style perfect for me. Every minute detail were explained logically which eventually helped during exams and beyond. The book containing notes is also a good one, consolidating everything together.
Cons
Pacing could've been better for revisions.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
On Study Leave
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants, Working Professionals / Articleship
Pros
Best for a newbie, great conceptual clarity. Best concept notes, will over deliver.
Cons
Not good for QB
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.