Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Concept Clarity
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Exam Focus & Efficiency
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Study Material & Notes
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
ICAI Questions Coverage
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Syllabus Coverage
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Doubt Resolution
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Revision Quality
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Pace of Teaching
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Value for Money
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Expectation Match
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. CareViews does not endorse any faculty.
Pragnesh Kanabar
(2)Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt, Multiple Attempts, Working Professionals, Concept Building
Pros
Even in the fasttrack batch, he explains everything (SAs, SQC1 and PE) so clearly nd crisply that audit feels more like a conceptual subject than a cramming one
Cons
If you want to study SAs and PE in detail, then go for him. In the fasttrack batch, the rest of the topics are mostly skimmed through. doubt support also needs improvement. I'd suggest attending his classes just for SAs and PE to build your understanding, then switching to the Icai module or another faculty's notes for the rest
One should buy his classes only after considering the pros and cons mentioned in the reviews
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Concept Building
Pros
Excellent conceptual clarity, teaching style is good, he links stuff practically and he is also quite funny ngl
Cons
His question bank is garbage. That’s it
V good experience from conceptual perspective. Don’t refer his QB and ur good to go
Shubham Keshwani
(2)Course
Regular
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants
Pros
Revision videos are good, individual chapters are good
Cons
Standards of auditing teaching is not good, taking too much hours and book is too long.
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: First Attempt, Last Day Revision, Fast Revision
Pros
Concise notes with pointers available
Cons
Marked almost every point as important.
Revision lecture ate very helpful even for those who had not seen lectures.