Careviews
← Compare

Auditing · Final

Pragnesh Kanabar

3.93 reviews
View profile →
vs
Rated Higher by Students

Shubham Keshwani

4.15 reviews
View profile →

Quick Answers

Computed from approved student reviews on Careviews

Who do students rate higher for Auditing, Pragnesh Kanabar or Shubham Keshwani?

Across 8 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Shubham Keshwani higher on 8 of 10 rating dimensions (1 tied).

What rating does Pragnesh Kanabar have on Careviews?

Pragnesh Kanabar is rated 3.9/5 by 3 CA students on Careviews for Auditing.

What rating does Shubham Keshwani have on Careviews?

Shubham Keshwani is rated 4.1/5 by 5 CA students on Careviews for Auditing.

Faculty Details

Detail
Pragnesh Kanabar
Shubham Keshwani
Language
English, Hindi
English, Hindi
Mode
Live, Google Drive
Google Drive, App

Ratings Comparison

Across 8 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Shubham Keshwani higher on 8 of 10 rating dimensions (1 tied).

Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.

Metric
Pragnesh Kanabar
Shubham Keshwani
Concept Clarity

Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?

5
4
Exam Focus & Efficiency

Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?

4.3
4.6
Study Material & Notes

Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?

3
3.4
ICAI Questions Coverage

Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?

4
4.4
Syllabus Coverage

Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?

3.3
3.6
Doubt Resolution

Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?

3.3
4.6
Revision Quality

Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?

4
4.6
Pace of Teaching

Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?

4.3
4.4
Value for Money

Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?

4
4
Expectation Match

Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?

3.7
3.8

What Students Are Saying

Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.

Pragnesh Kanabar

(3)

Course

Fast Track

Reviewer

Industrial Training

Attempt

Second Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✓ Recommends

Best for: Conceptual Learners, Repeaters, Exam-Focused Students

Pros

Good teaching methodology with real-life examples. Comprehensive coverage of the syllabus.

Cons

I ordered fasttrack lectures the material provided by them have like fill in the blanks types coloums which they will filled up in lectures so i think they should give a proper concept book.

Course

Regular

Reviewer

Full Time Student

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✓ Recommends

Best for: Concept Building

Pros

Excellent conceptual clarity, teaching style is good, he links stuff practically and he is also quite funny ngl

Cons

His question bank is garbage. That’s it

V good experience from conceptual perspective. Don’t refer his QB and ur good to go

Course

Fast Track

Reviewer

Full Time Student

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✓ Recommends

Best for: First Attempt, Multiple Attempts, Working Professionals, Concept Building

Pros

Even in the fasttrack batch, he explains everything (SAs, SQC1 and PE) so clearly nd crisply that audit feels more like a conceptual subject than a cramming one

Cons

If you want to study SAs and PE in detail, then go for him. In the fasttrack batch, the rest of the topics are mostly skimmed through. doubt support also needs improvement. I'd suggest attending his classes just for SAs and PE to build your understanding, then switching to the Icai module or another faculty's notes for the rest

One should buy his classes only after considering the pros and cons mentioned in the reviews

Shubham Keshwani

(5)

Course

Fast Track

Reviewer

Full Time Student

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Exam Oriented

✓ Recommends

Best for: First Attempt, Last Day Revision, Fast Revision

Pros

Concise notes with pointers available

Cons

Marked almost every point as important.

Revision lecture ate very helpful even for those who had not seen lectures.

Course

Regular

Attempt

Second Attempt

Teaching Style

Balanced

✗ Does not recommend

Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants

Pros

Revision videos are good, individual chapters are good

Cons

Standards of auditing teaching is not good, taking too much hours and book is too long.

Course

Fast Track

Reviewer

On Study Leave

Attempt

Second Attempt

Teaching Style

Balanced

✓ Recommends

Pros

Audit concepts are explained in a very practical way. Strong focus on standards and professional ethics. Teaching style is simple, clear, and easy to retain. Excellent exam-oriented approach with proper revision. Helps in understanding audit language and presentation. Real-life examples make concepts more relatable. Coverage of ICAI questions and amendments is comprehensive. Regular tests and discussions improve confidence. Notes are concise and highly useful for revision. Great guidance for both conceptual clarity and scoring well.

Cons

None

Course

Regular

Reviewer

Not In Articleship

Attempt

Third Attempt+

Teaching Style

Exam Oriented

✓ Recommends

Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants, First Timers, Repeaters

Pros

The thing that stood out the most was, he was very interactive and always replied to doubts personally ( voice notes ).

Cons

The notes used many short forms and memory tricks, it can get overwhelming at times.

The teaching style and revision videos are very good but the notes were very “to the point” and in exams I found it difficult to form a good structure around the main points and words. Other than that he’s good.

Course

Fast Track

Reviewer

On Study Leave

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Exam Oriented

✗ Does not recommend

Pros

The pace of classes was good

Cons

I would not recommend the Audit Notes - it is cut short way too much there are way too many differences compared to ICAI module and points cannot be retained well using his material

Ratings are half the decision.

The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.

Read the Buying Guide →