Auditing · Final
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Shubham Keshwani
(4)Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: First Attempt, Last Day Revision, Fast Revision
Pros
Concise notes with pointers available
Cons
Marked almost every point as important.
Revision lecture ate very helpful even for those who had not seen lectures.
Course
Regular
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants
Pros
Revision videos are good, individual chapters are good
Cons
Standards of auditing teaching is not good, taking too much hours and book is too long.
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
On Study Leave
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Pros
Audit concepts are explained in a very practical way. Strong focus on standards and professional ethics. Teaching style is simple, clear, and easy to retain. Excellent exam-oriented approach with proper revision. Helps in understanding audit language and presentation. Real-life examples make concepts more relatable. Coverage of ICAI questions and amendments is comprehensive. Regular tests and discussions improve confidence. Notes are concise and highly useful for revision. Great guidance for both conceptual clarity and scoring well.
Cons
None
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
Third Attempt+
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants, First Timers, Repeaters
Pros
The thing that stood out the most was, he was very interactive and always replied to doubts personally ( voice notes ).
Cons
The notes used many short forms and memory tricks, it can get overwhelming at times.
The teaching style and revision videos are very good but the notes were very “to the point” and in exams I found it difficult to form a good structure around the main points and words. Other than that he’s good.
Siddharth Agarwal
(0)Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.