Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Pros
Classes are not boring
Cons
1. The class is of 2 hrs 15 min out of which 30-40 min music is played 2. Their were few topics which were not taught
Compare Ankita Patni with other Law faculties before you decide.
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?