Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, First Timers
Pros
Great concept notes, really helpful. Questions coverage also good.
Cons
No cons as such, great teacher overall.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Exam-Focused Students, Rank Aspirants, Last-Minute Revisers, First Timers, Repeaters
Pros
Great way of teaching. He makes every topic very easy. Good balance between conceptual clarity and exam focus. His books are also good enough. His booster batch(revision videos) was very helpful.
Cons
Pacing can be issue for some. Explains every topic 3-4 or more times. But it will not be that big of issue
Go for Namit sir 👍. (I have written this review for his fm batch only, not for his sm batch)
Compare Namit Arora with other FM-SM faculties before you decide.
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?