CareViews
← Compare

FR · FINAL

Higher Rated

Aakash Kandoi

4.71 review
View profile →
vs

Parveen Jindal

2.31 review
View profile →

Faculty Details

Detail
Aakash Kandoi
Parveen Jindal
Language
English, Hindi
English, Hindi
Mode
Google Drive, App
Google Drive, Live

Ratings Comparison

Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.

Metric
Aakash Kandoi
Parveen Jindal

Concept Clarity

Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?

5
2

Exam Focus & Efficiency

Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?

4
1

Study Material & Notes

Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?

4
1

ICAI Questions Coverage

Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?

5
5

Syllabus Coverage

Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?

5
5

Doubt Resolution

Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?

4
5

Revision Quality

Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?

5
1

Pace of Teaching

Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?

5
1

Value for Money

Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?

5
1

Expectation Match

Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?

5
1

What Students Are Saying

Reviews represent individual student opinions. CareViews does not endorse any faculty.

Aakash Kandoi

(1)

Course

Regular

Reviewer

Full Time Student

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✓ Recommends

Best for: First Attempt

Pros

Friendly Teaching Style, some light stories help you to keep continue the class,

Cons

Don't remember

Very great experience and had completed the fr in one go

Parveen Jindal

(1)

Course

Regular

Attempt

Second Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✗ Does not recommend

Pros

Highly conceptual understanding

Cons

Very slow, makes you write notes, Question bank not systematic