Computed from 3 approved student reviews on Careviews
Would recommend
33% of 3 reviewers
Students most often tag it best for
Students rate highest
ICAI Questions Coverage (4.7)
Students rate lowest
Revision Quality (2)
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
Third Attempt+
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners
Pros
The only benefit is the coverage is so vast that you’ll cover even those topics which ICAI haven’t even asked yet.
Cons
The pacing was horrible and I can’t even go through one lecture without being asleep.
I don’t recommend him for new students, his teaching style is old school and there’s nothing wrong with that but it’s TOO SLOW. Also the revision video are also poor.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
On Study Leave
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners
Pros
Strong conceptual clarity in accounting standards. Complex FR topics are explained in a simple manner. Excellent coverage of Ind AS and practical adjustments. Teaching approach is highly exam-oriented. Notes and revision material are very useful. Focuses on important ICAI questions and amendments. Classes are interactive and easy to follow. Helps in improving presentation and answer-writing skills. Regular practice and revisions build confidence. Great support for conceptual as well as practical understanding.
Cons
None
Course
Regular
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Pros
Highly conceptual understanding
Cons
Very slow, makes you write notes, Question bank not systematic
Compare Parveen Jindal with other FR faculties before you decide.