Quick Answers
Computed from approved student reviews on Careviews
Who do students rate higher for FR, Ajay Agarwal or Parveen Jindal?
Across 7 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Ajay Agarwal higher on 7 of 10 rating dimensions.
What rating does Ajay Agarwal have on Careviews?
Ajay Agarwal is rated 3.8/5 by 4 CA students on Careviews for FR.
What rating does Parveen Jindal have on Careviews?
Parveen Jindal is rated 3/5 by 3 CA students on Careviews for FR.
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Across 7 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Ajay Agarwal higher on 7 of 10 rating dimensions.
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Ajay Agarwal
(4)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Working Professional
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: First Attempt, Multiple Attempts, Fast Revision
Pros
This is perfect for someone who is exam oriented and can trade-off some concept clarity for speed and exam oriented content coverage.
Cons
Doubt support could be better, and the fact that all sums are solved in class and no homework is given might be a con to some.
Great for first attempters and even repeat attempters just due to the fact that how on point and exam oriented the classes are, the only USP imo.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: First Attempt
Pros
No random talks in class. Concise notes. Detailed revision videos available on YouTube. Doubts are resolved by the faculty himself within 24 hours
Cons
He skips a few topics, which might come back to bite you in a difficult attempt
Good to go if you skim through the ICAI module once during revision
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: First Attempt, Last Day Revision, Fast Revision
Pros
Concise notes, and good revision lecture available on YouTube.
Cons
Weak doubt support
Good for students who have not completed classes during articleship and want to go through lectures at a fast pace.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Industrial Training
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Exam-Focused Students, Last-Minute Revisers
Pros
Notes are crisp and very exam oriented. However, they do miss minor concepts in their notes.
Cons
Used to talk 20% about politics, criticizing other people believes and trash talking about other faculties.
Parveen Jindal
(3)Course
Regular
Reviewer
On Study Leave
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners
Pros
Strong conceptual clarity in accounting standards. Complex FR topics are explained in a simple manner. Excellent coverage of Ind AS and practical adjustments. Teaching approach is highly exam-oriented. Notes and revision material are very useful. Focuses on important ICAI questions and amendments. Classes are interactive and easy to follow. Helps in improving presentation and answer-writing skills. Regular practice and revisions build confidence. Great support for conceptual as well as practical understanding.
Cons
None
Course
Regular
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Pros
Highly conceptual understanding
Cons
Very slow, makes you write notes, Question bank not systematic
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
Third Attempt+
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners
Pros
The only benefit is the coverage is so vast that you’ll cover even those topics which ICAI haven’t even asked yet.
Cons
The pacing was horrible and I can’t even go through one lecture without being asleep.
I don’t recommend him for new students, his teaching style is old school and there’s nothing wrong with that but it’s TOO SLOW. Also the revision video are also poor.
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.