Quick Answers
Computed from approved student reviews on Careviews
Who do students rate higher for Accounts, Anubhav Prakash Jain or Parveen Jindal?
Across 3 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Anubhav Prakash Jain higher on 7 of 10 rating dimensions (1 tied).
What rating does Anubhav Prakash Jain have on Careviews?
Anubhav Prakash Jain is rated 4.6/5 by 1 CA student on Careviews for Accounts.
What rating does Parveen Jindal have on Careviews?
Parveen Jindal is rated 3.5/5 by 2 CA students on Careviews for Accounts.
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Across 3 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Anubhav Prakash Jain higher on 7 of 10 rating dimensions (1 tied).
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Anubhav Prakash Jain
(1)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: First Attempt
Pros
This faculty is highly recommended for F2F if you're as interactive as the faculty is. Highly experienced and well versed with the ICAI pattern. Narrates concepts for 15 percent time, Explains notes for 20-25 percent time and solves questions for the balance time (of the class). There's a good coverage of every important topic. Plans every single question which is to be done at different phases of preparation : Class, 1st rev, 2nd rev and 3rd rev. His 50 hour revision series is publicly available for free, and updated for every attempt. Forms a deep bond with the students.
Cons
He would mostly deliver concepts right at the beginning with use of hypothetical scenarios and certain real-life examples, but that would require a lot of concentration as he would simply narrate it to the class. Strong listening skills is recommended for the students to quickly grasp the concepts. Most students get "zoned out" during his narrations. This approach worked 10-15 years back. Though most students also end up understanding the gist of it after seeing the notes.
Appropriate coverage of the relevant topics. Versatile for most topics though the most benefit lies when student has strong listening and imagination for deep Understanding of concepts. Question solving is great and with proper explanations. Questions are relevant.
Parveen Jindal
(2)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners
Pros
the teacher is great, knows the concept
Cons
very slow, 250+ hours, not exam focused
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners
Pros
1- in depth conceptual clarity 2- doubt solving is good 3- full support till exams
Cons
1- goes into too much depth due to which he begins to stretch the lecture 2- course duration is too long
Good teacher if u want conceptual clarity but in inter syllabus completion matters the most which would be a difficult affair considering the course duration is very long
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.