2 student reviews
Overall Rating
Calculated from approved student reviews.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners
Pros
1- in depth conceptual clarity 2- doubt solving is good 3- full support till exams
Cons
1- goes into too much depth due to which he begins to stretch the lecture 2- course duration is too long
Good teacher if u want conceptual clarity but in inter syllabus completion matters the most which would be a difficult affair considering the course duration is very long
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners
Pros
the teacher is great, knows the concept
Cons
very slow, 250+ hours, not exam focused
Compare Parveen Jindal with other Accounts faculties before you decide.