Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Arpita Tulsyan
(0)Nitin Nahar
(2)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Rankers, First Attempt, Concept Building, Last Day Revision
Pros
Teaching focused on concepts, concise but comprehensive notes and notes in such s format that 1.5 days before the exam is sorted.
Cons
Zero "entertainment" in lectures.
If you follow this man and his processes to the T, there's very little stopping you from passing.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Working Professionals / Articleship
Pros
In short - his concept clarity, practicality, prompt doubt solving, English language use, revision audios - are pros
Cons
In short - his question testing for exams, after lecture support in terms of concept linkers, latest rtp mtp not being solved, are all cons. Also less question solving in exam is an issue
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.