Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Working Professionals / Articleship
Pros
In short - his concept clarity, practicality, prompt doubt solving, English language use, revision audios - are pros
Cons
In short - his question testing for exams, after lecture support in terms of concept linkers, latest rtp mtp not being solved, are all cons. Also less question solving in exam is an issue
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Rankers, First Attempt, Concept Building, Last Day Revision
Pros
Teaching focused on concepts, concise but comprehensive notes and notes in such s format that 1.5 days before the exam is sorted.
Cons
Zero "entertainment" in lectures.
If you follow this man and his processes to the T, there's very little stopping you from passing.
Compare Nitin Nahar with other IDT faculties before you decide.
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?