Careviews
← Compare

Costing · Inter

Ashish Kalra

No reviews
View profile →
vs

Sharad Agrawal

51 review
View profile →

Quick Answers

Computed from approved student reviews on Careviews

What rating does Sharad Agrawal have on Careviews?

Sharad Agrawal is rated 5/5 by 1 CA student on Careviews for Costing.

Faculty Details

Detail
Ashish Kalra
Sharad Agrawal
Language
English, Hindi
English, Hindi
Mode
Live, Google Drive
Google Drive, Live

Ratings Comparison

Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.

Metric
Ashish Kalra
Sharad Agrawal
Concept Clarity

Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?

5
Exam Focus & Efficiency

Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?

5
Study Material & Notes

Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?

5
ICAI Questions Coverage

Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?

5
Syllabus Coverage

Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?

5
Doubt Resolution

Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?

5
Revision Quality

Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?

5
Pace of Teaching

Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?

5
Value for Money

Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?

5
Expectation Match

Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?

5

What Students Are Saying

Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.

Ashish Kalra

(0)
No reviews yet.

Sharad Agrawal

(1)

Course

Regular

Reviewer

Full Time Student

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✓ Recommends

Best for: First Attempt

Pros

Has been a CA Final faculty for Costing for 2008 to 2023. Shifted to CA Inter after it was introduced in SPOM. Highly experienced and knowledgeable of students approach. What stood out the most is how he enables the students into applying their own thought processes for developing concepts. Provides specifically tailored questions for retention of concepts over and above the basic HW. He has prepared an entire plan as to which specific questions is to be done and when, still teaches naturally in classes with full situation based knowledge. Provides certain insights occasionally. Initially behaves really strictly to establish a discipline and a rhythm perfect for studying, and discusses a lot of stuff relating to everything.

Cons

It ain't a con but may feel like a con, is that in initial days he ousts students solely for not doing HW (even a sub part). HW questions form an integral part of his teaching process and doesn't tolerate any deficiency of commitment, may oust for certain discipline breaches as well.

Great teacher with a good focus on conceptual clarity and retention. Well versed with the knowledge and the methods which could be applied for good propagation of concepts to students. Provides amazing insights.

Ratings are half the decision.

The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.

Read the Buying Guide →