Sharad Agrawal
1 student review
Ratings are calculated from approved student reviews and update as new reviews are published.
Faculty Details
Ratings
Concept Clarity
How easy was it to understand new concepts?
Exam Orientation
How well did the faculty focus on what actually matters in exams?
Study Material
Quality and usefulness of notes, books and study material.
ICAI Questions Coverage
Coverage of MTPs, RTPs, PYQs and important ICAI questions.
Syllabus Coverage
How completely was the syllabus covered?
Doubt Resolution
How effectively were doubts addressed?
Revision Quality
How helpful were revision classes and revision resources?
Notes Quality
Were the notes clear, concise and sufficient for revision?
Pace of Teaching
Was the teaching pace comfortable for learning?
Time Efficiency
How much lecture time was actually spent teaching instead of unrelated discussion?
Value for Money
Considering the price and experience, was the course worth it?
Expectation Match
Did the actual course match the demo lectures and marketing?
Student Reviews(1)
Reviews represent the opinions of individual students and do not necessarily reflect the views of CAFacultyReviews.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best suited for: First Attempt
PROS
Has been a CA Final faculty for Costing for 2008 to 2023. Shifted to CA Inter after it was introduced in SPOM. Highly experienced and knowledgeable of students approach. What stood out the most is how he enables the students into applying their own thought processes for developing concepts. Provides specifically tailored questions for retention of concepts over and above the basic HW. He has prepared an entire plan as to which specific questions is to be done and when, still teaches naturally in classes with full situation based knowledge. Provides certain insights occasionally. Initially behaves really strictly to establish a discipline and a rhythm perfect for studying, and discusses a lot of stuff relating to everything.
CONS
It ain't a con but may feel like a con, is that in initial days he ousts students solely for not doing HW (even a sub part). HW questions form an integral part of his teaching process and doesn't tolerate any deficiency of commitment, may oust for certain discipline breaches as well.
Great teacher with a good focus on conceptual clarity and retention. Well versed with the knowledge and the methods which could be applied for good propagation of concepts to students. Provides amazing insights.