CareViews
← Compare

Costing · INTER

Namit Arora

4.81 review
View profile →
vs
Higher Rated

Sharad Agrawal

51 review
View profile →

Faculty Details

Detail
Namit Arora
Sharad Agrawal
Language
English, Hindi
English, Hindi
Mode
Google Drive, App
Google Drive, Live

Ratings Comparison

Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.

Metric
Namit Arora
Sharad Agrawal

Concept Clarity

Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?

5
5

Exam Focus & Efficiency

Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?

5
5

Study Material & Notes

Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?

5
5

ICAI Questions Coverage

Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?

5
5

Syllabus Coverage

Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?

5
5

Doubt Resolution

Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?

4
5

Revision Quality

Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?

5
5

Pace of Teaching

Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?

4
5

Value for Money

Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?

5
5

Expectation Match

Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?

5
5

What Students Are Saying

Reviews represent individual student opinions. CareViews does not endorse any faculty.

Namit Arora

(1)

Course

Regular

Reviewer

Full Time Student

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✓ Recommends

Best for: First Attempt, Multiple Attempts, Concept Building, Fast Revision, Last Day Revision

Pros

He makes topic too easy. Explains the topic and logic behind it. His question bank is very vast covering questions from 2000s' MTPS, RTPS and PYQS, which is good for practice. And his booster batch(revision videos) is too good. That helped me to revise it quickly and still covering syllabus properly.

Cons

There is no such cons for me but i felt during classes that he explains every point multiple times(3-4 or maybe more times) which increases the durations of lectures. This affects the overall pacing of the batch.

Overall my experience was amazing and i highly recommend Namit sir. If you think , you are short on time or don't want to give 200+ hours for costing , you can opt for Fast Track. You can also refer to his revision videos and notes that he provide for revision videos , these helps too much during revision period.

Sharad Agrawal

(1)

Course

Regular

Reviewer

Full Time Student

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✓ Recommends

Best for: First Attempt

Pros

Has been a CA Final faculty for Costing for 2008 to 2023. Shifted to CA Inter after it was introduced in SPOM. Highly experienced and knowledgeable of students approach. What stood out the most is how he enables the students into applying their own thought processes for developing concepts. Provides specifically tailored questions for retention of concepts over and above the basic HW. He has prepared an entire plan as to which specific questions is to be done and when, still teaches naturally in classes with full situation based knowledge. Provides certain insights occasionally. Initially behaves really strictly to establish a discipline and a rhythm perfect for studying, and discusses a lot of stuff relating to everything.

Cons

It ain't a con but may feel like a con, is that in initial days he ousts students solely for not doing HW (even a sub part). HW questions form an integral part of his teaching process and doesn't tolerate any deficiency of commitment, may oust for certain discipline breaches as well.

Great teacher with a good focus on conceptual clarity and retention. Well versed with the knowledge and the methods which could be applied for good propagation of concepts to students. Provides amazing insights.

Namit Arora vs Sharad Agrawal — Costing Reviews (2026) | CareViews