Quick Answers
Computed from approved student reviews on Careviews
Who do students rate higher for Costing, Namit Arora or Sharad Agrawal?
Across 5 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Sharad Agrawal higher on 10 of 10 rating dimensions.
What rating does Namit Arora have on Careviews?
Namit Arora is rated 4.2/5 by 4 CA students on Careviews for Costing.
What rating does Sharad Agrawal have on Careviews?
Sharad Agrawal is rated 5/5 by 1 CA student on Careviews for Costing.
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Across 5 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Sharad Agrawal higher on 10 of 10 rating dimensions.
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Namit Arora
(4)Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Pros
I had a great learning experience with this faculty. The concepts were explained clearly with a strong focus on understanding, and the teaching style made even difficult topics easy to grasp. Overall, I would highly recommend this faculty to anyone looking for quality guidance.
Cons
No major drawbacks in my experience.
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Last-Minute Revisers
Pros
He's quick in covering the syllabus.
Cons
Questions covered are not difficult, and book contains irrelevant questions from 1990s at times.
Will not recommend him to anyone who's taken maths before. For some reason, i simply couldn't relate to his teaching style. Also his booster batch has extremely easy questions which are very common. Solely relying on it is a big mistake
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt, Multiple Attempts, Concept Building, Fast Revision, Last Day Revision
Pros
He makes topic too easy. Explains the topic and logic behind it. His question bank is very vast covering questions from 2000s' MTPS, RTPS and PYQS, which is good for practice. And his booster batch(revision videos) is too good. That helped me to revise it quickly and still covering syllabus properly.
Cons
There is no such cons for me but i felt during classes that he explains every point multiple times(3-4 or maybe more times) which increases the durations of lectures. This affects the overall pacing of the batch.
Overall my experience was amazing and i highly recommend Namit sir. If you think , you are short on time or don't want to give 200+ hours for costing , you can opt for Fast Track. You can also refer to his revision videos and notes that he provide for revision videos , these helps too much during revision period.
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Pros
he makes tough que look simple
Cons
you have to practice que yourself as there are many minute nuances you might miss while studying from him as he generally does not tell which que requires more attention
Sharad Agrawal
(1)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt
Pros
Has been a CA Final faculty for Costing for 2008 to 2023. Shifted to CA Inter after it was introduced in SPOM. Highly experienced and knowledgeable of students approach. What stood out the most is how he enables the students into applying their own thought processes for developing concepts. Provides specifically tailored questions for retention of concepts over and above the basic HW. He has prepared an entire plan as to which specific questions is to be done and when, still teaches naturally in classes with full situation based knowledge. Provides certain insights occasionally. Initially behaves really strictly to establish a discipline and a rhythm perfect for studying, and discusses a lot of stuff relating to everything.
Cons
It ain't a con but may feel like a con, is that in initial days he ousts students solely for not doing HW (even a sub part). HW questions form an integral part of his teaching process and doesn't tolerate any deficiency of commitment, may oust for certain discipline breaches as well.
Great teacher with a good focus on conceptual clarity and retention. Well versed with the knowledge and the methods which could be applied for good propagation of concepts to students. Provides amazing insights.
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.