Careviews
← Compare

Auditing · Inter

Rated Higher by Students

Neeraj Arora

3.92 reviews
View profile →
vs

Pragnesh Kanabar

3.22 reviews
View profile →

Quick Answers

Computed from approved student reviews on Careviews

Who do students rate higher for Auditing, Neeraj Arora or Pragnesh Kanabar?

Across 4 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Neeraj Arora higher on 7 of 10 rating dimensions (3 tied).

What rating does Neeraj Arora have on Careviews?

Neeraj Arora is rated 3.9/5 by 2 CA students on Careviews for Auditing.

What rating does Pragnesh Kanabar have on Careviews?

Pragnesh Kanabar is rated 3.2/5 by 2 CA students on Careviews for Auditing.

Faculty Details

Detail
Neeraj Arora
Pragnesh Kanabar
Language
English, Hindi
English, Hindi
Mode
Google Drive, App
Live, Google Drive

Ratings Comparison

Across 4 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Neeraj Arora higher on 7 of 10 rating dimensions (3 tied).

Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.

Metric
Neeraj Arora
Pragnesh Kanabar
Concept Clarity

Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?

4.5
3
Exam Focus & Efficiency

Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?

3.5
3
Study Material & Notes

Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?

4.5
3
ICAI Questions Coverage

Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?

4.5
3.5
Syllabus Coverage

Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?

4.5
4.5
Doubt Resolution

Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?

3.5
3
Revision Quality

Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?

3.5
2.5
Pace of Teaching

Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?

3
3
Value for Money

Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?

3.5
3
Expectation Match

Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?

3.5
3.5

What Students Are Saying

Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.

Neeraj Arora

(2)

Course

Regular

Reviewer

Not In Articleship

Attempt

Third Attempt+

Teaching Style

Balanced

✓ Recommends

Best for: Repeaters, Conceptual Learners

Pros

The notes are precise and highlights keywords as needed for the exam, concept clarity is top notch and revision and doubt support is good too along with guidance sessions included within the course! Question bank and course both are inclusive of lots of mcqs and case based questions as well.

Cons

Mcq tests if missed can not be accessed later

Course

Regular

Reviewer

Not In Articleship

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✗ Does not recommend

Pros

His notes are good, concise and in legal form from ICAI material. He also uses a little more unconstrained, or may I say just very conversational and slangy language while explaining the concepts, so it doesn't get boring easily. he does give you a question of the day for writing practice and also explains it again in class.

Cons

The language may not make the class get boring easily, but it gets annoying when it goes on for a while. After a while, even though u understood the concept in class, it gets harder to recall it cause it gets overshadowed by more of his irrelevant gossip/ talks. I had a hard time recalling the words he said as a way to make us remember the keywords, cause it would get overlapped with all the rubbish.

Overall, I wouldn't suggest taking his classes unless you can handle all the chatter and have selective hearing.

Pragnesh Kanabar

(2)

Course

Regular

Reviewer

Full Time Student

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✓ Recommends

Best for: First Attempt

Pros

He has very too the point teaching style. He provides great conceptual clarity and gives mnemonics which helps in remembering points. The thing i liked the most was the notes he made us write during lectures . The notes were too good .

Cons

For my batch , i got old recordings of some non SA part. But the audio and video quality was bad which affected my overall experience. He has revision videos which are good but bit messy. He has two 3-4 hours video covering major syllabus.

Overall the teaching style and notes of the sir are too good. You can definitely go for him if you can manage for the cons i said.

Course

Regular

Reviewer

In Articleship

Attempt

First Attempt

Teaching Style

Conceptual

✗ Does not recommend

Pros

NOTHING LITERALLY NOTHING

Cons

The major con was that he mentioned on his site the the course was of 90 something hours and the software is below average with no way to count total no. of classes except brute force. when i counted the hours it was over 115 hrs. It made me cry to the extent i called sir and he just told me to watch his revision classes on yt instead of returning me money or providing me with fastrack batch. When i saw his yt revision , the concept clarity was still not there but i completed them in 1 to 2 weeks and then in the last he mentioned that many of the important concepts were not covered there and i have to watch them by searching for them in final classes. Still somehow i cleared my group 2 thanks to other faculties whose name i will not be mentioning so that this does not llok like paid review

Ratings are half the decision.

The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.

Read the Buying Guide →