2 student reviews
Overall Rating
Calculated from approved student reviews.
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Compare Pragnesh Kanabar with other Auditing faculties before you decide.
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Pros
NOTHING LITERALLY NOTHING
Cons
The major con was that he mentioned on his site the the course was of 90 something hours and the software is below average with no way to count total no. of classes except brute force. when i counted the hours it was over 115 hrs. It made me cry to the extent i called sir and he just told me to watch his revision classes on yt instead of returning me money or providing me with fastrack batch. When i saw his yt revision , the concept clarity was still not there but i completed them in 1 to 2 weeks and then in the last he mentioned that many of the important concepts were not covered there and i have to watch them by searching for them in final classes. Still somehow i cleared my group 2 thanks to other faculties whose name i will not be mentioning so that this does not llok like paid review
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt
Pros
He has very too the point teaching style. He provides great conceptual clarity and gives mnemonics which helps in remembering points. The thing i liked the most was the notes he made us write during lectures . The notes were too good .
Cons
For my batch , i got old recordings of some non SA part. But the audio and video quality was bad which affected my overall experience. He has revision videos which are good but bit messy. He has two 3-4 hours video covering major syllabus.
Overall the teaching style and notes of the sir are too good. You can definitely go for him if you can manage for the cons i said.