Costing · INTER
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Concept Clarity
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Exam Focus & Efficiency
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Study Material & Notes
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
ICAI Questions Coverage
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Syllabus Coverage
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Doubt Resolution
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Revision Quality
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Pace of Teaching
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Value for Money
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Expectation Match
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. CareViews does not endorse any faculty.
Nitin Guru
(1)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: First Attempt, Last Day Revision
Pros
Concept clarity. Quality notes. Extensive question solving. Had fun in class
Cons
Bad doubt solving. The course is very long.
Its an amazing course for the first time introduction with costing and definetely helps devlop the way to read and understand questions where after the class, even no revision can easily get you anove 50 marks, atleast thats what happened with me on my first attempt
Sharad Agrawal
(1)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt
Pros
Has been a CA Final faculty for Costing for 2008 to 2023. Shifted to CA Inter after it was introduced in SPOM. Highly experienced and knowledgeable of students approach. What stood out the most is how he enables the students into applying their own thought processes for developing concepts. Provides specifically tailored questions for retention of concepts over and above the basic HW. He has prepared an entire plan as to which specific questions is to be done and when, still teaches naturally in classes with full situation based knowledge. Provides certain insights occasionally. Initially behaves really strictly to establish a discipline and a rhythm perfect for studying, and discusses a lot of stuff relating to everything.
Cons
It ain't a con but may feel like a con, is that in initial days he ousts students solely for not doing HW (even a sub part). HW questions form an integral part of his teaching process and doesn't tolerate any deficiency of commitment, may oust for certain discipline breaches as well.
Great teacher with a good focus on conceptual clarity and retention. Well versed with the knowledge and the methods which could be applied for good propagation of concepts to students. Provides amazing insights.