Quick Answers
Computed from approved student reviews on Careviews
Who do students rate higher for Auditing, Pragnesh Kanabar or Rishabh Jain?
Across 6 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Rishabh Jain higher on 10 of 10 rating dimensions.
What rating does Pragnesh Kanabar have on Careviews?
Pragnesh Kanabar is rated 3.2/5 by 2 CA students on Careviews for Auditing.
What rating does Rishabh Jain have on Careviews?
Rishabh Jain is rated 4.7/5 by 4 CA students on Careviews for Auditing.
Faculty Details
Ratings Comparison
Across 6 approved student reviews on Careviews, students currently rate Rishabh Jain higher on 10 of 10 rating dimensions.
Calculated from approved reviews. Differences may reflect review volume, not just faculty quality.
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
What Students Are Saying
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Pragnesh Kanabar
(2)Course
Regular
Reviewer
Full Time Student
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Attempt
Pros
He has very too the point teaching style. He provides great conceptual clarity and gives mnemonics which helps in remembering points. The thing i liked the most was the notes he made us write during lectures . The notes were too good .
Cons
For my batch , i got old recordings of some non SA part. But the audio and video quality was bad which affected my overall experience. He has revision videos which are good but bit messy. He has two 3-4 hours video covering major syllabus.
Overall the teaching style and notes of the sir are too good. You can definitely go for him if you can manage for the cons i said.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Pros
NOTHING LITERALLY NOTHING
Cons
The major con was that he mentioned on his site the the course was of 90 something hours and the software is below average with no way to count total no. of classes except brute force. when i counted the hours it was over 115 hrs. It made me cry to the extent i called sir and he just told me to watch his revision classes on yt instead of returning me money or providing me with fastrack batch. When i saw his yt revision , the concept clarity was still not there but i completed them in 1 to 2 weeks and then in the last he mentioned that many of the important concepts were not covered there and i have to watch them by searching for them in final classes. Still somehow i cleared my group 2 thanks to other faculties whose name i will not be mentioning so that this does not llok like paid review
Rishabh Jain
(4)Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants
Pros
Conceptual clarity
Cons
Pacing
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Exam-Focused Students, Working Professionals / Articleship
Pros
Best teacher if you want practical knowledge of audit
Cons
He won't make you learn, so you have to do the rattafication by yourself
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants, Working Professionals / Articleship
Pros
besttt for conceptual clarity with insights of the audit world
Cons
high priced but the knowledge sir gives is worthh it
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants, First Timers
Pros
Without a doubt, one of the finest Audit faculties I've studied from. His biggest strength is the way he builds concepts before expecting students to memorize anything. He relates Audit standards and procedures to practical business situations, making the subject much easier to understand. His explanations are logical, structured, and easy to retain. Even the most theory-heavy topics feel interesting because of his teaching approach. Every lecture is well-planned, focused, and keeps you engaged throughout. He strikes the right balance between conceptual understanding and exam-oriented preparation. If you're someone who wants to understand Audit instead of blindly memorizing it, he's an excellent choice.
Cons
Honestly, I couldn't point out any major weakness. His teaching style, conceptual approach, and overall quality are consistently excellent.
Ratings are half the decision.
The Buying Guide covers the other half — format, validity, demo bias and every check before you pay.