Cons

For my batch , i got old recordings of some non SA part. But the audio and video quality was bad which affected my overall experience. He has revision videos which are good but bit messy. He has two 3-4 hours video covering major syllabus.

Cons

The major con was that he mentioned on his site the the course was of 90 something hours and the software is below average with no way to count total no. of classes except brute force. when i counted the hours it was over 115 hrs. It made me cry to the extent i called sir and he just told me to watch his revision classes on yt instead of returning me money or providing me with fastrack batch. When i saw his yt revision , the concept clarity was still not there but i completed them in 1 to 2 weeks and then in the last he mentioned that many of the important concepts were not covered there and i have to watch them by searching for them in final classes. Still somehow i cleared my group 2 thanks to other faculties whose name i will not be mentioning so that this does not llok like paid review

Cons

Much of his shortcuts are not retained , so didn't actually came in handy

Cons

Material could be a bit more exhaustive, not from an exam perspective, but from a conceptual one.

Cons

Extremely poor in explaining concepts , by relating them to the field of study. He constantly brought up food and irrelevant annoying tv shows.

Cons

His demo lectures are excellent, and he teaches smaller or less concept-heavy chapters well. However, when it comes to large, concept-intensive chapters, the teaching quality drops significantly, and the conceptual explanation isn't strong enough. If you're someone who struggles with theory subjects or prefers understanding concepts instead of memorizing them, this teaching style may not suit you. Don't choose a faculty solely based on popularity. In my opinion, there are better Audit faculties available. I personally wouldn't recommend Shubham Keshwani Sir for students looking for strong conceptual clarity