Computed from 6 approved student reviews on Careviews
Would recommend
100% of 6 reviewers
Students most often tag it best for
Students rate highest
Students rate lowest
Value for Money (4.7)
Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: First Timers, Rank Aspirants, Conceptual Learners
Pros
A crazy good mix of concept clarity plus exam oriented approach. Would recommend, cool guy.
Cons
Yeah pacing could be faster ig, but like its VERY likely that in order to do justice to the subject that is definitely necessary. Go for it.
Honestly if you are severely time constrained then its not your cup of tea, its worth every second of listening to but if only if you start early/ at a proper time else i can easily see it spiralling out, so yes other than that 10/10 worth it, been a month since i completed his lectures and i still actively try and think about whatever guidance he gave.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: First Timers, Conceptual Learners
Pros
A no-nonsense guy. Provides 100% conceptual clarity.
Cons
The course duration is pretty long especially in comparison to his competitors. After one point you feel like there's something as too many hours.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants, First Timers, Repeaters
Pros
Great teaching style with focus on conceptual clarity, practical examples, intuitive approach to problem solving, and exam-preparedness. Concept notes has got good coverage for quick recap and the youtube revision videos are a life saver.
Cons
The fees might seem a bit on the pricier side compared to other options, but it is definitely worth the buck.
Great faculty to learn from to have great conceptual clarity and continued interest in the subject. I've scored exemptions in all three papers he teaches (FR, SFM & GFRS(6E)).
Course
Fast Track
Reviewer
In Articleship
Attempt
First Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Exam-Focused Students, Conceptual Learners
Pros
Notes, revision and teaching are good
Cons
Sometimes while in a hurry in explanation can go wrong in explanations, need to watch out but rare
Course
Fast Track
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Exam-Focused Students, Rank Aspirants, Repeaters, First Timers, Last-Minute Revisers, Working Professionals / Articleship
Pros
Too the point teaching, concepts explained deeply, questions and answers in detailed manner. Dedicated whatsapp group for solving doubts by a team of professionals
Cons
No Cons
Compare Bhavik Chokshi with other FR faculties before you decide.