Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
On Study Leave
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Balanced
Pros
None
Cons
Pace of classes can feel a bit fast at times. Some topics may require additional self-practice. Lectures can become lengthy for detailed concepts. Revision sessions could be more frequent. Heavy syllabus may feel overwhelming initially. More practical examples on certain topics would help. Notes can feel too detailed for quick revision. Doubt-solving response time may vary during peak season. Frequent amendments make the subject difficult to track sometimes. Requires consistent revision to retain concepts effectively.
Compare Raj Kumar with other IDT faculties before you decide.
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?