Are concepts explained clearly, or do you need to Google everything after class?
Does teaching stay exam-relevant, or does it wander into topics that won't be tested?
Are the notes good enough to revise from, or do you need to rewrite everything?
Are MTPs, RTPs, and PYQs covered thoroughly in class?
Was the full syllabus covered, or were chapters quietly skipped?
Reviews represent individual student opinions. Careviews does not endorse any faculty.
Course
Regular
Reviewer
Not In Articleship
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Conceptual
Best for: Conceptual Learners, Rank Aspirants, Working Professionals / Articleship, First Timers
Pros
Anyone who is looking to deep dive into finance should give him a try.
Cons
Straight, to the point and raw approach is not liked by many students
Course
Regular
Attempt
Second Attempt
Teaching Style
Exam Oriented
Pros
Deeply conceptual but not exam oriented
Cons
Too much time pass during the classes, provides 6-8 books, teaches extra stuff outside the course, keeps blaming ICAI and other faculties, cross sells other courses like CFA, FRM, stock market courses
Compare Sanjay Saraf with other AFM faculties before you decide.
Are doubts actually resolved, or just acknowledged and moved on from?
Do revision classes help you consolidate, or are they just a slow replay?
Is the teaching pace comfortable — not too fast to follow, not too slow to keep up?
Is this course worth the fees compared to what else is out there?
Did the actual course match what the demo lectures and marketing promised?